Just watched on blu-ray

For discussion of Matt Reeve's Film Let Me In

Moderator: LMI Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
Imnotazombie
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 3:32 am
Location: Indiana

Re: Just watched on blu-ray

Post by Imnotazombie » Fri Feb 04, 2011 6:57 pm

ColBlair wrote:
Imnotazombie wrote:
He knew she was naked cause he felt her, she wasn't keeping a distance, she just wasn't all out snuggling with him. And just because they leave out the crotch shot don't mean they leave out the sexual ambiguity all together, she still mentions she's not a girl, and nothing. And even though she IS a girl as its been said before, she's still NOTHING like in the original, as she never went through puberty, so the sexual ambiguity is still there. And lets say it wasn't, I think its still pretty iffy to call it run of the mill, I mean seriously? This is anything BUT run of the mill. But thats just my thoughts, there are other things I disagree with, but thats much more a matter of an opinion. :)
I agree, I think Owen felt her when she lied beside him. to me, when Abby says to Owen that she's not a girl, maybe she meant that she was a creature.
I think she means that but also she IS nothing because she never really achieved sexual maturity, cause she was turned before she could. So really she's still pretty androgynous like in the original. I still like the original more though, to me you could rush to happier conclusions, where in this it pretty much forces you to see Owens life to be like the Fathers.

ColBlair
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:05 pm

Re: Just watched on blu-ray

Post by ColBlair » Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:17 pm

Imnotazombie wrote:I think she means that but also she IS nothing because she never really achieved sexual maturity, cause she was turned before she could. So really she's still pretty androgynous like in the original. I still like the original more though, to me you could rush to happier conclusions, where in this it pretty much forces you to see Owens life to be like the Fathers.
Yeah, that's what I also started to think too after I seen the film, that Owen maybe the next caretaker. Though maybe, if he is the next caretaker, then he might be a bit smarter. ;)

joshpaid
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 4:20 pm

Re: Just watched on blu-ray

Post by joshpaid » Sun Feb 06, 2011 2:35 am

i feel a bit tardy, but as far as Abby safely entering the pool, during the scene where she enters Owen's apartment uninvited and hemorrhages blood, she explains that's what happens when she enters a "home" uninvited. she makes a point of stating "home", so that leads me to believe she can safely enter public places.

User avatar
Imnotazombie
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 3:32 am
Location: Indiana

Re: Just watched on blu-ray

Post by Imnotazombie » Sun Feb 06, 2011 2:58 am

joshpaid wrote:i feel a bit tardy, but as far as Abby safely entering the pool, during the scene where she enters Owen's apartment uninvited and hemorrhages blood, she explains that's what happens when she enters a "home" uninvited. she makes a point of stating "home", so that leads me to believe she can safely enter public places.
Well then why in the book did Eli ask to be invited into the pool structure? This version was based on the book too, and took details from it, so I think Matt took that terminology into account. I think she broke in herself, and risked her life blood leaking out of her and everything just to save Owen as fast as possible.

User avatar
crazychristina
Posts: 654
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 1:17 am

Re: Just watched on blu-ray

Post by crazychristina » Sun Feb 06, 2011 3:43 am

There were some inconsistencies about the 'inviting in' rule. Eli didn't need to be invited into Oskar's apartment building, only into his actual apartment. In the book she didn't need to be invited into the hospital, only into Hakan's room in the hospital. In the film they added an invite into the hospital but that was an afterthought, and probably not necessary. I think John required an invite into the pool as a dramatic device and not because it was actually consistent with the mythology he was working with.

User avatar
Imnotazombie
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 3:32 am
Location: Indiana

Re: Just watched on blu-ray

Post by Imnotazombie » Sun Feb 06, 2011 10:08 pm

crazychristina wrote:There were some inconsistencies about the 'inviting in' rule. Eli didn't need to be invited into Oskar's apartment building, only into his actual apartment. In the book she didn't need to be invited into the hospital, only into Hakan's room in the hospital. In the film they added an invite into the hospital but that was an afterthought, and probably not necessary. I think John required an invite into the pool as a dramatic device and not because it was actually consistent with the mythology he was working with.
I think it would've been more heartfelt if he didn't include that as a "dramatic device". But thats whats nice about books, you can just scribble what you don't like out : )

ColBlair
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:05 pm

Re: Just watched on blu-ray

Post by ColBlair » Sun Feb 06, 2011 10:42 pm

Imnotazombie wrote:
crazychristina wrote:There were some inconsistencies about the 'inviting in' rule. Eli didn't need to be invited into Oskar's apartment building, only into his actual apartment. In the book she didn't need to be invited into the hospital, only into Hakan's room in the hospital. In the film they added an invite into the hospital but that was an afterthought, and probably not necessary. I think John required an invite into the pool as a dramatic device and not because it was actually consistent with the mythology he was working with.
I think it would've been more heartfelt if he didn't include that as a "dramatic device". But thats whats nice about books, you can just scribble what you don't like out : )
I agree with you there man!

User avatar
DavidZahir
Posts: 694
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 4:24 am

Re: Just watched on blu-ray

Post by DavidZahir » Thu Feb 24, 2011 11:26 pm

ColBlair wrote:I think in my mind that in the films themselves, that Abby can go inside public places, but not privately owned places.
I see it a little differently. She needed to be invited into the hospital room, but not the hospital itself. Just as nothing prevented her from entering the apartment building at the start, or even an empty apartment (her own or the basement apartment). Yet an occupied apartment or bedroom, she needed permission.

So I don't see a problem with her entering a gym.
O let my name be in the Book of Love. If it be there I care not
For that Other great Book above. Strike it out! Or write it in anew--
But let My name be in the Book of Love!
-- Omar Kayam

ColBlair
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:05 pm

Re: Just watched on blu-ray

Post by ColBlair » Thu Feb 24, 2011 11:30 pm

DavidZahir wrote:
ColBlair wrote:I think in my mind that in the films themselves, that Abby can go inside public places, but not privately owned places.
I see it a little differently. She needed to be invited into the hospital room, but not the hospital itself. Just as nothing prevented her from entering the apartment building at the start, or even an empty apartment (her own or the basement apartment). Yet an occupied apartment or bedroom, she needed permission.

So I don't see a problem with her entering a gym.
Actually, I viewed the hospital room as a privately owned place. ;) Though you do have a point there of what you just said. :) :) :)

User avatar
lombano
Posts: 2993
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 9:56 pm
Location: Xalapa, Mexico
Contact:

Re: Just watched on blu-ray

Post by lombano » Fri Feb 25, 2011 5:12 am

Imnotazombie wrote:
ColBlair wrote:
Imnotazombie wrote:
He knew she was naked cause he felt her, she wasn't keeping a distance, she just wasn't all out snuggling with him. And just because they leave out the crotch shot don't mean they leave out the sexual ambiguity all together, she still mentions she's not a girl, and nothing. And even though she IS a girl as its been said before, she's still NOTHING like in the original, as she never went through puberty, so the sexual ambiguity is still there. And lets say it wasn't, I think its still pretty iffy to call it run of the mill, I mean seriously? This is anything BUT run of the mill. But thats just my thoughts, there are other things I disagree with, but thats much more a matter of an opinion. :)
I agree, I think Owen felt her when she lied beside him. to me, when Abby says to Owen that she's not a girl, maybe she meant that she was a creature.
I think she means that but also she IS nothing because she never really achieved sexual maturity, cause she was turned before she could. So really she's still pretty androgynous like in the original.
An immature girl would still be a girl. Abby clearly is female, so these statements could be interpreted either as being inhuman or, (and this seems far more likely) as referring to some kind of issue with sexuality (think deleted scene).
Bli mig lite.

Post Reply

Return to “Let Me In”