Thomas to Owen: Can the Cycle Be Broken?
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 4:47 am
I do not believe Owen becoming the next Thomas is inevitable. Nevertheless, I am struck afresh by how strongly LMI seems to favor the "cycle interpretation." Consider:
1) The movie begins with Thomas. At first I did not realize how significant this is. But given all the fascination with Abby, it is easy to forget that LMI is primarily about Owen. And given this Owen-centeredness, it is noteworthy that LMI starts, not with Owen, but with Thomas. Indeed, Thomas gets a surprising amount of screen time during the first half of the movie. Assuming that Reeves knows what he's doing (and I believe he does), the primary purpose for giving all this time to Thomas may be to develop Owen's character and story. LMI begins with Thomas. It ends with Owen. The implication is obvious.
2) The one time Owen and Thomas make eye contact seems visually designed to draw a connection between the two. Both are wearing hats, have something in their mouths, and are holding their hands to their mouths. As Thomas walks away, he pauses and turns back to glance at Owen. Thomas isn't stupid. He gets it even now. He's on his way out.
3) The soundtrack is not terribly hopeful. I am a visual learner, so it is very easy for me to neglect things like sound and score. Whenever I watch LMI, the first thought I always have is, "Oh, right - there's a soundtrack." I believe the sound, like the images and dialogue, is intended to communicate something. I have never received training in music, so I'm happy to be corrected, but the soundtrack strikes me as pretty consistent with Owen repeating Thomas' life. Yes, I know there are those subtle sounds of children laughing at the end of the credits. I've listened to those few seconds many times, wondering. Perhaps Owen could take a different path. (Indeed, I'd like to argue later for the possibility of Owen going his own way.) It's just that the soundtrack for the most part seems to favor an ominous outcome.
4) LMI is a horror movie. I rarely watch such movies anymore. During childhood I saw all the usual suspects (Halloween, Friday the 13th, Nightmare on Elm Street, etc.) countless times. But in the last 20 years I think I've seen a total of two (Scream, The Ring). So again, please feel free to correct me. But isn't it fair to say that horror movies don't usually have happy endings? Indeed, if a horror movie does manage to resolve everything, isn't it normal to tack on some concluding scene that throws everything up in the air again? I realize LMI is certainly not the typical horror movie. Nevertheless, does its very genre not imply an unpleasant future for Owen?
5)The filmstrip. I reckon there's nothing I could possibly say about this that hasn't already been said. Whether you love it or hate it, the filmstrip is a critical element of Let Me In. The filmstrip means something. Abby's gesture toward the filmstrip means something. Owen's reaction to the filmstrip means something. And whatever the sum total of all that is, I don't think it's supposed to be something good.
6) Unconditional love and acceptance is a theme in Let Me In. If Owen sees that future, if he gets it, if he realizes he may very well become Thomas, then that makes his decision to let Abby in all the more remarkable. I think this is what Reeves is going for - an almost unreal love shown for Abby, in spite of all the realities that go along with that. In other words, the cycle interpretation seems very consistent with what the movie is trying to show about Owen's level of devotion and acceptance.
Given how likely it is that Owen becomes the next Thomas, it seems the only way it won't happen that way is for Owen to man up and force their relationship and their future onto some other path. If the cycle is going to stop, he's the one who has to stop it. I think the movie does show him maturing and developing in that direction, in the direction of someone who could actually wrench Abby's life onto another course. But that's a topic for another post!
1) The movie begins with Thomas. At first I did not realize how significant this is. But given all the fascination with Abby, it is easy to forget that LMI is primarily about Owen. And given this Owen-centeredness, it is noteworthy that LMI starts, not with Owen, but with Thomas. Indeed, Thomas gets a surprising amount of screen time during the first half of the movie. Assuming that Reeves knows what he's doing (and I believe he does), the primary purpose for giving all this time to Thomas may be to develop Owen's character and story. LMI begins with Thomas. It ends with Owen. The implication is obvious.
2) The one time Owen and Thomas make eye contact seems visually designed to draw a connection between the two. Both are wearing hats, have something in their mouths, and are holding their hands to their mouths. As Thomas walks away, he pauses and turns back to glance at Owen. Thomas isn't stupid. He gets it even now. He's on his way out.
3) The soundtrack is not terribly hopeful. I am a visual learner, so it is very easy for me to neglect things like sound and score. Whenever I watch LMI, the first thought I always have is, "Oh, right - there's a soundtrack." I believe the sound, like the images and dialogue, is intended to communicate something. I have never received training in music, so I'm happy to be corrected, but the soundtrack strikes me as pretty consistent with Owen repeating Thomas' life. Yes, I know there are those subtle sounds of children laughing at the end of the credits. I've listened to those few seconds many times, wondering. Perhaps Owen could take a different path. (Indeed, I'd like to argue later for the possibility of Owen going his own way.) It's just that the soundtrack for the most part seems to favor an ominous outcome.
4) LMI is a horror movie. I rarely watch such movies anymore. During childhood I saw all the usual suspects (Halloween, Friday the 13th, Nightmare on Elm Street, etc.) countless times. But in the last 20 years I think I've seen a total of two (Scream, The Ring). So again, please feel free to correct me. But isn't it fair to say that horror movies don't usually have happy endings? Indeed, if a horror movie does manage to resolve everything, isn't it normal to tack on some concluding scene that throws everything up in the air again? I realize LMI is certainly not the typical horror movie. Nevertheless, does its very genre not imply an unpleasant future for Owen?
5)The filmstrip. I reckon there's nothing I could possibly say about this that hasn't already been said. Whether you love it or hate it, the filmstrip is a critical element of Let Me In. The filmstrip means something. Abby's gesture toward the filmstrip means something. Owen's reaction to the filmstrip means something. And whatever the sum total of all that is, I don't think it's supposed to be something good.
6) Unconditional love and acceptance is a theme in Let Me In. If Owen sees that future, if he gets it, if he realizes he may very well become Thomas, then that makes his decision to let Abby in all the more remarkable. I think this is what Reeves is going for - an almost unreal love shown for Abby, in spite of all the realities that go along with that. In other words, the cycle interpretation seems very consistent with what the movie is trying to show about Owen's level of devotion and acceptance.
Given how likely it is that Owen becomes the next Thomas, it seems the only way it won't happen that way is for Owen to man up and force their relationship and their future onto some other path. If the cycle is going to stop, he's the one who has to stop it. I think the movie does show him maturing and developing in that direction, in the direction of someone who could actually wrench Abby's life onto another course. But that's a topic for another post!