Handling the undead spoiler review, by me :)

For discussion of John Ajvide Lindqvist's novel Hanteringen av odöda
Post Reply
User avatar
intrige
Posts: 4208
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:20 pm
Location: Norway
Contact:

Handling the undead spoiler review, by me :)

Post by intrige » Tue Feb 20, 2024 11:34 pm

So I brought a friend, my other friend couldn't come as planned to this one stepped in. Her sister died when she was young, for context.

I knew some things from the book, that I read when I was a wee 17-yearold baby 'Trige. I quite liked it, and some parts stuck out, like, the death creature, that lady who was religious, Elias the zombie child, and the hamster incedent. But apart from that I didn't remember much.

But I knew pretty quickly that some people were altered or stuck together. Like Flora, who met death as a kid, is now the big sister of the kid with the hamster, and it is a bunny now, not a hamster. The religous lady is gone. I don't even remember an old lesbian couple, but they might have been in the book. The parts of the book that I loved the most, how realistically it was handled by the goverment and such, barely showed. Ok so..

The lady who died in a carcrash, and awoke a few hours later. It was mostky about the family, and not about her. But the scene where she sqweezed the bunny to death was there. How she talked and how she acted, wasn't there much. She didn't talk, and I get that the actors was supposed to, play dead.. And how do you even do that? But I felt it needed more, of something, with the lady who died in the car crash.
The old couple was sweet and sad, and I did like that a quite a lot more, emotionwize. She cried, was in the fridge, refused to eat and so on. It felt like she was sleepwalking in a way, but with a sollem undertone. Her wife, man, that was so sad. In the end, she killed herself and her dead wife ate her. So the zombie thing was there. But by far the worst, and best part, was of course Elias, the dead child.

That grandfather was a damn good actor first of all, and the kid oh man. The realistic parts of how a corpse decomposes and all of that, ugh it was so damn gross. The part when the grandpa washed Elias in the tub made me want to puke. But it too was convinsing actingwise. The kid seemed like a dazed shell of a person. And his decomposing corpse was so gross, with eyedrops to open the eyes that were shut, the mother pressing out the poop when she pushed on his petruding belly. Ugh and the bathing. The way the kid wheezed in pain, his eyes looking at his mother, it was really well done. But the mother, she was in some parts convinsing. And in others, not. Like, how would you react when an unknown man/zombie bites and killled your aging father? She didn't react all that much. And ended up throwing her decomposing son overboard of a rowboat after he bit her, and after her father died. She didn't react much in the end. But the depravity and strength of a mother's love was evident, and acted well. But her reactions to things in the end of the film wasn't, done very well. The part where she says goodbye to her son made my friend cry. And she told me she remembers when loved ones has died and you always wish them back. But this movie shows the price of that actually happening, and how the grief gets extended and more painful. So it sin't worth it.

I hoped I would see death in this film, as a wolf or something, ya know? Or a flashback from when Flora fell into the river, or lake?? But no, nothing. She had a boyfriend, that didn't really go anywhere. Her kid brother sang funural prayer song in arabic? I am not sure that is correct, for his lil bunny, and probably mother. That was nice. But I just, didn't connect with that family. I don't know why, because apart from the dead mother zombie parts, the acting was so good. I had hoped for the more supernatural aspects of the book to shine, and the more administrative goverment things to show more, and that the dead mother had something to say. That would have been so cool. But no, and the ending was sort of open ended too. But I think that was from the book?

I am not gonna see this film again, because the parts with Elias disgusted me so, which is the point of course. But all in all it was a pretty good film. Especially for a Norwegian made film, they are usually pretty terrible. (Not like the Swedes and Danes who are known to make pretty good movies) I was impressed, and the make.up was pretty stellar. Very convincing. Whoever diracted that kid should earn some sort of reward. The sound design was pretty good, and creepy, too. Both with disgusting soundeffects and creepy music. Pretty good. And many of the shots reminded me a lot of LTROI in that was was long slow moving shots with people moving about past it and beyond it. But it was pretty, I'll give it that.

So that's what I think :) :|
Bulleri bulleri buck, hur många horn står upp

User avatar
Siggdalos
Posts: 359
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2020 8:22 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: Handling the undead spoiler review, by me :)

Post by Siggdalos » Wed Feb 21, 2024 8:05 pm

intrige wrote:
Tue Feb 20, 2024 11:34 pm
Like Flora, who met death as a kid, is now the big sister of the kid with the hamster, and it is a bunny now, not a hamster.
In the book, it's Eva who almost drowned and met Death as a child (which inspired one of the characters in the children's book series she wrote). Flora has psychic abilities but she doesn't encounter Death until the events of the novel. And it's a rabbit in the book too.
intrige wrote:
Tue Feb 20, 2024 11:34 pm
The religous lady is gone. I don't even remember an old lesbian couple, but they might have been in the book.
In the book, Elvy is straight and it's her dead husband (Flora's grandfather) who returns. The film changed them to a same-sex couple and removed all relation to Flora.
intrige wrote:
Tue Feb 20, 2024 11:34 pm
In the end, she killed herself and her dead wife ate her.
Hm. The way I understood it is that her wife murdered her, the implication being that all of the undead were starting to become aggressive. Could be I misinterpreted the scene, though.
intrige wrote:
Tue Feb 20, 2024 11:34 pm
But no, and the ending was sort of open ended too. But I think that was from the book?
What happens in the novel is that it's revealed that the behavior of the undead change depending on the thoughts of living people around them, and because of the living's negative thoughts, the undead break out of the Heath (the area where they're contained) and storm into Stockholm to start killing people. (I think one can imagine that the film is heading toward a similar scenario, even though it's not shown on-screen.) This happens parallel with the scene with Mahler, Anna, and Elias, which is almost identical in both the book and the film, except for the fact that the book ends with Anna handing Elias' soul over to Death so he can go to the afterlife.

I mostly agree with your criticisms, since I also think the supernatural side and society's/the government's reaction are some of the better parts of the book and it would've been nice to see more of them them in the film. I think I disagree with you on Anna's actor, though. I thought she was convincing the whole time -- to me, her seeming lack of reaction to things seemed appropriate and believable for someone in shock.
De höll om varandra i tystnad. Oskar blundade och visste: detta var det största. Ljuset från lyktan i portvalvet trängde svagt in genom hans slutna ögonlock, la en hinna av rött för hans ögon. Det största.

Post Reply

Return to “Handling The Undead”